[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages not using po-debconf - more active actions to come



On 02/20/05 04:04, Martin Quinson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 04:08:34AM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:


I made a small coordination site:

http://people.debian.org/~lwall/i18n/

There are still several packages that don't have a "please switch to po-deconf" bug. I guess we should start by sending these bugs...


I'm not sure it's the right way to go. I've made so much such bugs that I
know rather well how to proceed. My last move (for at least 2 years, I
promise) from city tocity was this WE, so I should have some more time in
the next weeks.

I thus suggest that you focus on NMUing bugs with the old bugs (your page
may display the bugs' age), and I'll try to submit the missing bugs.

Agreed. I'll stop sending these bugs and focus on the NMUs. We still
have to define a process to do the NUMs thou. So I'll just wait for
further input.

BTW, your page is really cool.

Thanks!

K.

--
Lucas Wall <kthulhu@kadath.com.ar>      .''`.
Buenos Aires, Argentina                : :ø :   Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.kadath.com.ar               `. `'  http://www.debian.org
PGP: 1024D/84FB46D6                      `-
      5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356A        http://people.debian.org/~lwall
      4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6        mailto:lwall@debian.org



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: