On Sunday 16 January 2005 17:35, Christian Perrier wrote: > What is your opinion about possible followups? > > Should the Reply-To of such mails be set to -i18n only or should we > keep the threads crossposted? I think in general the followups should go only to -i18n. In most cases I feel it will be the announcement that is of interest to -boot, and not the followups. If followup _is_ relevant to -boot, maybe the original submitter or the coordinators could post a summary to -boot. For proposals that need discussion maybe the following procedure could be followed: - proposal that's mainly technical in nature - initial proposal and discussion on -boot - post summary and ask opinion of translators on -i18n - post summary and discuss on -boot - post conclusion on -i18n - proposal that's mainly i18n in nature - initial proposal and discussion on -i18n - post summary and discuss on -boot - post conclusion on -i18n
Attachment:
pgpNgtdjOdAyn.pgp
Description: PGP signature