String freeze (was Re: Debian Debconf Translation: Compromise)
- To: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Cc: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
- Subject: String freeze (was Re: Debian Debconf Translation: Compromise)
- From: barbier@linuxfr.org (Denis Barbier)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:27:09 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040112202709.GC32736@zobe.linuxfr.org>
- In-reply-to: <20040109130320.GB17289@azure.humbug.org.au>
- References: <20040107142958.GB22189@riva.ucam.org> <20040107170704.32351bd0.newsuser@famdijkstra.org> <20040107161453.GB23118@riva.ucam.org> <87u137yabq.fsf@student.kuleuven.ac.be> <20040107210417.GA3325@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <20040108180313.GA31779@zobe.linuxfr.org> <20040109062540.GH6323@mykerinos> <20040109091945.GA14900@projectcolo.org.uk> <87ptdtz6qy.fsf_-_@student.kuleuven.ac.be> <20040109130320.GB17289@azure.humbug.org.au>
[Cc: debian-i18n to get translators' attention]
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:03:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
> I guess the alternative would be to setup something like:
>
> Day 1: Cleanup freeze begins. No uploads that aren't approved
> by RM team will make it into the next stable. Uploads
> will be approved that fix security bugs, and translations
> for packages that have been last uploaded less than four
> weeks ago. Other uploads that include important fixes may
> be accepted.
> Day 15: Security freeze only. Uploads will only be accepted that
> fix security issues.
> Day 30: Release
>
> This would mean the translation team would have to have someone collating
> translations for packages and NMUing them, and that they'd have to be on
> the ball enough to have already uploaded translations for things that
> haven't changed in the past month, and to finish off everything in a
> couple of weeks. It'd have to be NMUs in at least some cases, because
> a couple of weeks probably isn't enough time to coordinate with all
> maintainers. It'd have to be a couple of weeks, because without britney,
> a separate distribution is just too much of a nuisance to maintain. And
> it'd have to be limited to packages that have recently been uploaded
> to ensure that we don't come across any unknown FTBFS problems due to
> changes in the toolchain.
Sounds fair. I will go through the BTS and collect l10n related
bugreports so that they can be worked on. If there are other people
interested in helping, please send me a mail so that we can coordinate
our efforts.
Denis
Reply to: