Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > Oh, understood, I've been reviewing the rules file for debian-installer. > One question: the rules file for the debian-installer just uses > binary-arch, shouldn't binary-indep be used to generate the > debian-installer-manual package instead? The manual is architecture specific. > Now, a new question: is it possible do reupload new > debian-installer-documentation without breaking the previous images? (if I > understand it correctly, debian-installer builds both the documentation and > the images of the CD-ROM, net, HD, etc. installatons) > > If that's not possible, maybe the documentation package should be > independent from debian-installer. I thought I just explained the problems with making the documentation separate. > Would it actually make sense to have a > documentation-only source package that would generate the > debian-installer-deb and the byhand stuff? There is no byhand stuff for documentation. You seem confused. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature