Re: proposal how to improve current Debian l10n framework
- To: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: proposal how to improve current Debian l10n framework
- From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:02:14 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040401050214.GJ23481@mykerinos>
- In-reply-to: <1080774211.19536.4.camel@a1200>
- References: <1080123672.15221.6.camel@a1200> <20040324103728.GA27722@nikolai.prokoschenko.pc> <1080135498.16092.5.camel@a1200> <20040331083325.GI4635@galadriel.cri2000.ens-lyon.fr> <1080774211.19536.4.camel@a1200>
Quoting Jure Cuhalev (gandalf@owca.info):
> Probably creating of l10n specific mailing list where we can discuss
> things more opeoplepeoplen-topic is needed.
It is my feeling that debian-i18n list is not enough cluttered by
mail. So, we can probably use it.
Large parts of Debian are now properly i18nized, so using -i18n for
-l10n stuff is IMHO not a problem.
Reply to: