Re: [RFC] Chapter for the debian reference about l10n
- To: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org>
- Cc: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Chapter for the debian reference about l10n
- From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:24:47 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305211819320.11660@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net>
- In-reply-to: <20030519073703.GG5002@galadriel>
- References: <87wugyxoxi.fsf@yiwaz.raw.no> <20030512233159.GA10215@zobe.linuxfr.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305130631400.5182@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net> <20030513064608.GA1813@twinette.migus.eu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305130923120.15374@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net> <20030513103746.GD11507@galadriel> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305131251110.15374@trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net> <20030514100729.GH11507@galadriel> <20030514122702.GA15870@thunker.thunk.org> <20030514152900.GJ11507@galadriel> <20030519073703.GG5002@galadriel>
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Internationalizing, translating and being internationalized and translated
[SNIP]
I think that having atleast some references on how to handle translations
will avoid other flamewars and misunderstandigs.
But atleast the flamewar was not completly useless since it spotted a few
things (policy or best practise) that are still floating in a "gray area"
and need a better definition.
Thanks for your work
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html
Reply to: