Hi, At Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:20:50 +0800, ha shao wrote: > gbk is a superset of gb2312. So gbk can substitute gb but not the otherway > around. I worried about the difference b/w GBK-EUC-H > and GB-EUC-H because i don't know how this will affect cross-distribution > compatibility. what will happen if a ps file saved under debian is > printed on an turbolinux(cjk) or cle+redhat system? is it better if > everyone adopt defoma? Ask them to use Debian :) I don't consider cross-distro compatibility is that important. Generally it is hard to realize that all PCs have the same image of a ps file generated under a certain PC using various fonts available for the PC. BTW, we Japanese have defact standard PostScript font names for Japanese characters: Ryumin-Light and GothicBBB-Medium. If there're ones for Chinese/Korean characters and people use only the defact fonts, cross-distro compatibility may be ensured. Are there defact standard PostScript font names for Chinese/Korean? -- Yasuhiro Take aka hirot / <take@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgpjtb0udCpcZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature