Re: Why don't we put the .po template in /usr/doc/package ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > But putting the .pot files as a part of the ordinary binary package would
> > not be the right thing to do.
>
> Look:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5824 Mar 14 23:45 /usr/doc/lftp/lftp.pot.gz
It is installed by the upstream Makefile, or by the Debian maintainer?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNRE8QiqK7IlOjMLFAQESqgP/UDt74JnPhJ6hfCetkFjwAco9mj6mBPU4
CETaP0/7V+POQ+wC1+TyLglytddRzbT26UmP4UvX4mIhAro6t2PAHVpEDW+qL1Fr
EmgexoROIJpYH6QTuGqcO06muXAfe94D+cIpJA+/R1xAq4vfsvulybXyi00+bYTw
omPAk/EN9ys=
=DR1k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: