Re: Why don't we put the .po template in /usr/doc/package ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 18 Mar 1998, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> If I could find *.po files somewhere on my disk (no, I don't
> have time to bother with fetching and exploring source packages), I'd
> consider to translate several of them myself.
We could make then a .deb package of all the .po template files
(i.e. .pot files).
Or we could make a list of packages having .po files and put it in the
web pages.
Or we could arrange a small repository of .po files in a ftp.debian.org
subdirectory.
But putting the .pot files as a part of the ordinary binary package would
not be the right thing to do.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNQ/uUCqK7IlOjMLFAQF8KgQAmVUmwV3H7H2Oju5QFmitQMksPQRgxrFD
5zXg7yEA2NGYbeqKw/vdvXv/JYeySMOh5EQuk+AP1isHEQNA6gb9ggIZBAw0ZJNq
WUshFCNTLU4bpmF2Xotc2PxSwB+QUtcr41PTG90aab2Laux2O4GT3LhaVanm7XjZ
YwvMKKiIfSw=
=Wbwf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: