Re: 64bit startup

[Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>]

Samuel Thibault, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 14:05:35 +0200, a ecrit:
> jbranso@dismail.de, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 11:52:02 +0000, a ecrit:
> > October 25, 2023 3:43 AM, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
> > > jbranso@dismail.de, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 03:40:16 +0000, a ecrit:
> > > 
> > >> Or maybe GCC is partly at fault for the
> > >> Hurd's X86_64 building troubles?
> > > 
> > > It's not at all. Nor is libtool.
> > > 
> > > I occasionally had issues in ./configure, too.
> > > 
> > > You'll say that's "yeah, it's all about auto-crap". No.
> > > 
> > > It's *very* most probably about bash, simply.
> > 
> > Hmmm. I guess in the long-term then, the bash issues should be fixed.
> 
> It'd really better be short-term, because currently we cannot really
> trust the built packages: what if due to shell script misbehavior
> ./configure misdetects features, forgets enabling some support
> etc. That'd lead to subtle incompatibilities that'll be hard to hunt
> down.

Today's gcc attempt:

Comparing stages 2 and 3
Bootstrap comparison failure!
libbacktrace/.libs/sort.o differs

Samuel