Re: Re-evaluating architecture inclusion in unstable/experimental

[Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>]

Svante Signell, le dim. 02 sept. 2018 19:45:19 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may
> > > provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual
> > > suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion.
> > >  [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/
> > 
> > Such statistics are really difficult to get any real conclusion from.
> > Sometimes 10% packages are missing just for one tricky nonLinux-specific
> > issue in one package.
> 
> Correct: One example is cmake for both hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-any.
> It does not even have to be tricky.

If it's not tricky, a NMU should be able to fix it easily.

Samuel