Re: Samuel: Do you have permission to _enable_ the gccgo patches again?
Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote:
> I just saw:
> This is really a large step BACK:
It's not a step back, it's just fixing something that is completely
> Since you could issue that commit to _disable_
> gccgo for Hurd, what about committing to _enable_ gccgo for Hurd instead.
Because that would take *way* more time to do, and my current priority
is rather glibc.