Bug#885056: gcc-7: Please enable PIE on hurd-i386
Package: gcc-7
Version: 7.2.0-18
Severity: important
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertag: hurd
Hello,
We have eventually fixed the issue we had with PIE: gdb support.
So could you please enable PIE by default? That should fix the build of
gpgme1.0, thus unlocking a lot of packages.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.14.0 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages gcc-7 depends on:
ii binutils 2.29.1-12
ii cpp-7 7.2.0-18
ii gcc-7-base 7.2.0-18
ii libc6 2.25-3
ii libcc1-0 8-20171102-1
ii libgcc-7-dev 7.2.0-18
ii libgcc1 1:8-20171102-1
ii libgmp10 2:6.1.2+dfsg-1.1
ii libisl15 0.18-1
ii libmpc3 1.0.3-2
ii libmpfr4 3.1.6-1
ii libstdc++6 8-20171102-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5
Versions of packages gcc-7 recommends:
ii libc6-dev 2.25-3
Versions of packages gcc-7 suggests:
ii gcc-7-doc 7.2.0-1
pn gcc-7-locales <none>
ii gcc-7-multilib 7.2.0-18
pn libasan4-dbg <none>
pn libatomic1-dbg <none>
pn libcilkrts5-dbg <none>
pn libgcc1-dbg <none>
pn libgomp1-dbg <none>
pn libitm1-dbg <none>
pn liblsan0-dbg <none>
pn libmpx2-dbg <none>
pn libquadmath0-dbg <none>
pn libtsan0-dbg <none>
pn libubsan0-dbg <none>
-- no debconf information
--
Samuel
<y> update-menus: relocation error: update-menus: symbol _ZNSt9basic_iosIcSt11char_traitsIcEE4initEPSt15basic_streambufIcS1_E, version GLIBCPP_3.2 not defined in file libstdc++.so.5 with link time reference
<y> quoi que ça peut bien vouloir dire ?
<D> N a eu la meme merde
<y> c ça que ça veut dire ? wow, c'est bien crypté :)
-+- #ens-mim s'entraide -+-
Reply to: