On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:16:17PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 12:20:18 +0100, wrote: > > Why, because it doesn't have a sleep statement? > > I was referring to strict logic: it's not just because it happens to Also, using sleep for synchronization is always wrong. -- Richard Braun