Re: dateutils: FTBFS on hurd-i386 (for review)
Svante Signell, le Thu 15 May 2014 08:43:13 +0200, a écrit :
> > Also, why this:
> >
> > > @@ -701,7 +706,7 @@
> > >
> > > case 0:;
> > > /* i am the child */
> > > - static char *const diff_opt[] = {
> > > + char *diff_opt[] = {
> > "diff",
> > > "-u",
> > > expfn, actfn, NULL,
> >
> > Apart from that, it looks fine.
>
> As the code is written I can use
> char *const diff_opt[]
> or
> char *diff_opt[]
> but not
> static char *const diff_opt[]
> or
> static char *diff_opt[]
Why?
The existing code is using static const, what happens if you don't leave
it as it is?
Samuel
Reply to: