Re: Bug#699585: gdb: ftbfs on hurd-i386
Samuel Bronson, le Sat 02 Feb 2013 00:39:29 -0500, a écrit :
> The Hurd people should probably investigate whether a MACH macro is
> actually useful in the first place: Why not __MACH__? Is there
> something which would stop working if MACH were no longer defined?
Well, this is the same under Linux with the "linux" macro, and "i386",
etc. :)
But yes, we do consider dropping the MACH macro, we have checked the
Debian source for such macros, it should be fine.
I however don't know how far we are on this, anybody?
Samuel
Reply to: