Re: The Debian GNU/Hurd web page
Svante Signell, le Tue 05 Jun 2012 09:34:14 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 04:30 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Mon 04 Jun 2012 11:14:37 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Having . in PATH; requires more internal changes, like discussed at
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2012-05/msg00028.html
> > > Any news on that?
> >
> > Again, probing for news will *not* make them magically appear.
>
> Of course not, but when people don't tell anyone what they are working
> on (or planning to work on), nobody's knowledge increase.
People keep working on this and that. It's usually not useful to fill
the list with such information, particularly when you don't even know
whether you will be able to complete it.
> > When there are news to give, they are given. When there aren't, well,
> > they aren't.
>
> As announced by your reply to the iconx and execve subject, there was
> news, good ones.
Yes. Yesterday night. Not before. My reply to the iconvx and execve was
*NOT* triggered by your probbing about the issue. Definitely not.
> My follow-up question is if bug #654381 on icon is now
> redundant and be closed, or should it be resubmitted with a removal of
> the . in PATH part? This affects which changes to make on the web page.
Bugs shall be closed only when they are fixed. The issue isn't fixed
yet. At best it can be marked as pending, but that won't buy much.
I know information is useful, but the time spent on it shouldn't eat too
much the time spent on actually doing things.
Samuel
Reply to: