[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hurd-i386 qualification for Wheezy

On 19.05.2012 19:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Very quickly following up on a possible nomenclature issue and a couple
of other things.

On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 17:29 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
- We of course aim at tech preview for wheezy only, not a full
release. Our goal is to establish a testing distribution for wheezy
which does not block others ports (i.e. so-called fuckedarch), and get
a full testing for wheezy+1.

That's not what the phrase "tech preview" was used to mean for
kfreebsd-* at least.
I'm not sure we've ever released with an architecture which was in
either broken or fucked, but hopefully someone will correct me if I'm
mistaken on that.

Anyone? :-)

Opinions as to whether it makes sense to release an architecture in either of those states would also be welcome.



Reply to: