Re: Comments on xerces-c patch please
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:10:59PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I guess I was not clear enough, here what we want to check for is if
> “realpath(path, NULL)” works correctly (notice the NULL argument),
> before POSIX.1-2008 (and newer GNU/* and FreeBSD systems) this was
> undefined behaviour, so even if the system has realpath() it might
> not have what we want from it.
I'd like to suggest an alternative approach would be to test against
PATH_MAX itself (eg, #ifndef PATH_MAX). Arguably a system which provides
neither PATH_MAX not a POSIX.1-2008 realpath() is broken anyway.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:38:05AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I think Guillem did the right thing here: he explained you exactly why
> your patch is not ready for submission yet, and how you can make it so.
Jeremie Koenig <email@example.com>