Re: 'shutdown now' failed
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Samuel Thibault <email@example.com> wrote:
> John Smith, le Wed 20 Jul 2011 01:12:00 +0200, a écrit :
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Svante Signell
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > I think reboot or halt is better, but still fs checks are happening when
>> > they shouldn't.
>> Hrm. Good point. Dont want no bogus fsck messages. Also, maybe
>> 'shutdown' should be aliased to a 'use halt instead message', or just
>> alias 'shutdown' to plain 'halt' ?
> Will most probably be rejected by the sysvinit maintainer. Better
> simply fix using SYSV on hurd-i386.
So how to fix that, without having actual SYSV equivalent 'runlevels
?Are 'runlevels' even a goal for 'Hurd' ? Or is it just a on/off
mechanism for Hurd ? If not, whats the alternative, and how does that
relate to Unix SYSV init style runlevels ?
- John Smith