Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hallo! > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:47:19 +0100, Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:33:27AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: >>> http://blog.ganneff.de/blog/2011/03/23/debian-ftpmaster-meeting-2011-2.html >>> >>> Anyway, it looks like we have up to two years (until the Wheezy release) >>> to get Hurd into (technology review) release status. >> Yes, that's about it; we agreed to evaluate the situation at wheezy's >> release. If the hurd-i386 port manages to release with wheezy as a >> technology preview, it stays in. If not, it will be removed from >> ftp.debian.org to debian-ports (or elsewhere). > > So -- if we have this noble goal, and think that it's realistic, then we > should coordinate working towards it. As we've seen in this thread's > later messages, there are already some issues known, and others still > have to be evaluated. I have the feeling that we'll need a structured > approach to avoid bad surprises. Basic time management, defining goals, > working on them, checking them, and all that. :-) I agree. This really is a massive opportunity to get hurd out there. > Now, where to collect all this? I can, of course, offer the GNU/Hurd > pages, but probably this should rather be on a Debian wiki page? I've created a wiki page like the kFreeBSD one: http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/Hurd There is the Alioth site for debian-hurd: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-hurd/ This includes things needed to manage the project. And can we get hurd-i386 added to the graph on https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ Regards, Mike.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature