Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?

To: bug-hurd@gnu.org, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:45:59 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100818034559.GC1117@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100817213913.GB4814@const.famille.thibault.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20100817213913.GB4814@const.famille.thibault.fr>

Hello!

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:39:13PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> IIRC, the currently recommended way is to use partition type 83 (Linux)
> just because the old debian installer only recognizes those.  Is there
> any other reason which prevents us from using type 63 in the Debian
> installer?

<http://www.google.com/search?q=gnu+hurd+0x63>, first hit:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/faq.html>.

:-)

(Could do with some proper integration / reformatting, though.)


Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?
  - From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Add /lib/ld.so and /servers/exec to Hurd initrd's.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Add /lib/ld.so and /servers/exec to Hurd initrd's.
Previous by thread: Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?
Next by thread: Re: Ihre Anfrage Nr. 270367207987
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread