Re: Qemu boot problem
I used that one
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/GNU_002fHurd.html#GNU_002fHurd
, but in /boot/ directory only two files gnumach.gz and servers.boot.
cat /boot/servers.boot contains:
module /hurd/ext2fs.static -A --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
--host-priv-port=${host-port} --device-master-port=${device-port} --exec-
server-task=${exec-task} -T typed ${root} $(task-create) $(task-resume)
module /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec $(exec-task=task-create)
But when i tried to type it manualy in grub console like that:
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/gnumach.gz
module /hurd/ext2fs.static -A --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
--host-priv-port=${host-port} --device-master-port=${device-port} --exec-
server-task=${exec-task} -T typed ${root} $(task-create) $(task-resume)
module /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec $(exec-task=task-create)
boot
but it shows another panic message:
Assertion 'port->ip_srights > 0' failed in file "../ips/ipc_port.c", line 1020
panic: Debugger invoked, but there isn't one
Btw, in modules load messages i can see only part of message:
message 0: /hurd/ext2fs.static -A --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-
line} --host-priv-port=${host-port} --device-master-port=${device-port} --
exec-server-task
and then module 1 message, is it okay?
As an answer to your question on Понедельник 09 ноября 2009 21:01:12 Samuel
Thibault:
> gordev, le Mon 09 Nov 2009 20:47:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > root (hd0,0)
> > kernel /boot/gnumach.gz
> > module /boot/servers.boot
> > boot
>
> Which (bogus) document told you to use servers.boot?
> It could have been /boot/serverboot, but we don't use that any more. See
> the sample snippet in grub:
>
> kernel /boot/gnumach.gz root=device:hd0s7
> module /hurd/ext2fs.static -A
> --multiboot-command-line=${kernel-command-line}
> --host-priv-port=${host-port} --device-master-port=${device-port}
> --exec-server-task=${exec-task} -T typed ${root} $(task-create)
> $(task-resume) module /lib/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec
> $(exec-task=task-create)
>
> Samuel
>
Regards
Reply to: