Re: New machine for shitbox
Dani Doni, le Sat 05 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200, a écrit :
> On 7/5/08, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net <olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> > On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it
> > for the wiki exclusively would be a waste...
> > Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two
> > distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)
>
> Maybe using web caching software like memcached[1] can help minimize
> disk access, as wiki content could be served from memory and only
> updates would hit the database triggering a cache update.
The problem is _not_ serving, it is updating.
If the cpu is 100% busy during updates, then that's the cpu which is too
slow, not the disk.
Samuel
Reply to: