Hi, On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:23:42AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: > olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote: > >Looks good. But is it really intentional, that this patch needs to be > >applied on top of the previous one?... > You lost me there, what gives that impression? Well, just look at the patch you sent. It's a diff against your previous version, not against the original file. -antrik-