On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 23:25, Steven Curtis wrote: > I have a question regarding the absence of a libdb4 package for Debian > GNU/Hurd. There are several packages that rely directly or indirectly on > the existence of libdb4. I downloaded the source, and it compiled cleanly. > I am not experienced in Debian package maintenance, and was wondering if > there was an outstanding reason as to why this software hasn't yet been > packaged for the Hurd. I plan on taking a crack at figuring out how to do > so, but couldn't figure out why such cleanly compiling software causing so > many outstanding dependencies hasn't been packaged yet. I'm not trying to > raise anyone's ire, just trying to find out if there was a good reason not > to attempt this. The list archives don't mention anything, so I'm appealing > to the wisdom of the bazaar. Was it the package that built cleanly, or upstream source? If it was the package, then I will make sure that it goes in tomorrow. Tks, Jeff Bailey
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part