[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Woody release - WHAT is current status



Heya Anthony,  I'm not on Debian-devel, so please keep me cc:'d.

Please define in what ways the hurd-i386 autobuilding efforts are not
acceptable.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:47:31AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> What's needed to fix this for the Hurd Porting efforts?
> 
> -- 
> -- Grant Bowman                                <grantbow@grantbow.com>
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> -----
> From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Woody release - WHAT is current status
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 23:14:15 +1000
> Message-ID: <20020530131415.GB29836@azure.humbug.org.au>
> 
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > it's on the todo list for arm as i noticed that lack of feature a
> > few days ago. and well, i never knew that it was a necessary item
> > before woody is released. 
> 
> It's not. You'll need to fix some stuff up when the
> security-accepted-autobuilding is done, but that's not ready for anyone
> yet. That hurd, arm and m68k aren't doing accepted autobuilding yet for
> unstable is just an interesting factoid, not a problem.
> 
> Cheers,
> aj
> 
> -- 
> Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
> 
>      ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' 
>                     -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 One of the great things about books is sometimes
 there are some fantastic pictures.
 -- George W. Bush 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: