Re: libexec in glibc
email@example.com (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> 1) What gets added to the FHS is not a Debian decision,
> 2) Debian released architectures need to conform to FHS, and
> 3) Ports still being worked on don't need to treat (2) as their top
> priority, especially when they expect FHS will change in relevant
> ways before the port is released.
If top-level directories are allowed to be added by the people that
make a distribution then the whole discussion is quite irrelevant.
I will ask about this on the FHS lists..
Alfred M. Szmidt