Re: Compiling ghostscript

To: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.ernet.in>
Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Compiling ghostscript
From: Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 04:53:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020611085301.4E2C21BA15@perdition.linnaean.org>
In-reply-to: Kapil Hari Paranjape's message of Tue, 11 June 2002 11:54:00 +0530 <[🔎] 20020611062400.GA3021@imsc.ernet.in>

> Hello,
> 
> Anyone come across "PIPE_BUF" before. In Linux this is 
> defined in /usr/include/linux/limits.h
> 
> 	#define PIPE_BUF        4096    /* # bytes in atomic write to a pipe */
> 
> One of the drivers (exactly one!) in gs-6.53 references
> this and it is not compiling because of that. 
> 

Change it to use sysconf(_SC_PIPE_BUF) #ifndef PIPE_BUF.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Compiling ghostscript
  - From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.ernet.in>

Prev by Date: Compiling ghostscript
Next by Date: gimp1.2 porting (relative) success
Previous by thread: Compiling ghostscript
Next by thread: Re: Compiling ghostscript
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread