On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:57:23AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Please define in what ways the hurd-i386 autobuilding efforts are not
> acceptable.
Nononono.
"accepted autobuilding" means "automatically building packages from
queue/accepted". ie, shortly after they're uploaded rather than some
time after they've been put in the archive.
You don't need to worry about this until hurd's ready to release.
> > ----- Forwarded message from Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> -----
> > From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > > it's on the todo list for arm as i noticed that lack of feature a
> > > few days ago. and well, i never knew that it was a necessary item
> > > before woody is released.
> >
> > It's not. You'll need to fix some stuff up when the
> > security-accepted-autobuilding is done, but that's not ready for anyone
> > yet. That hurd, arm and m68k aren't doing accepted autobuilding yet for
> > unstable is just an interesting factoid, not a problem.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
Attachment:
pgpF3pWZVEnm3.pgp
Description: PGP signature