Re: stat() and its consequences (was: Re: Strange behavior while copying files)
Neal H Walfield <email@example.com> writes:
> Passive translator are connected to the inode. Thus, if we have two
> hard links to a translator, what is the current working directory? We
> just do not know.
I agree that makes it harder to do the Right Thing (as well as
figuring out what that is ;-)
> So, in conclusion to fix this, you need to change the interface to
> fshelp_fetch_root to pass a port to the current working directory and
> change a few callers. Personally, I would welcome this change.
Hmm, now I've tried reading the kode. dir-lookup.c, fetch-root.c and
start-translator-long.c. I figure the "current" directory is the dnp
variable in dir_lookup, right? But I don't understand how the cwd, or
other ports like stdio, are set for the new process.
> You have one of those weird characters in your name and it is messing
> my mutt up. I always realize after I send a message to you.
Sorry about that. I use the from address "firstname.lastname@example.org (Niels
Möller)". I find it a little odd that a MUA parses an rfc 822
_comment_ for mail addresses in that way.