Re: Port to linux arch hurd-doc
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 02:19:44PM +0100, Daniele Cruciani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to learn more on hurd while I'm on linux, absurd? (I'm
> sure noone actually thinks so).
>
> There's no documentation pachage at all for hurd and gnumach ?
> (someone like to say "first learn next do" ... )
>
> Doc package is arch-independent, if someone pack it for linux, it's ok
> for hurd too or hurd fs it have another hierarchy at all.
The most meaningful package that can be made is hurd-doc, consisting of Hurd
Reference Manual. Better read documents from the Web or download them. The
documentation of Hurd is not in a stage to be packaged.
> I'm not subscribed to the list, but I'll read the archive on the web,
> so, if someone decide to do it or if the package exist but is not in
> debian/linux, I don't need replay, if I should to pack something and
> I can help replay me directly.
Yeah, mailing lists have a lot of information about what's going on.
--
Ognyan Kulev <ogi@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>, "\"Programmer\""
Reply to: