Re: SSH patch finished & third shot at PAM
I think the line below is meant to be #ifndef MAXPATHLEN, not #ifdef
MAXPATHLEN. Just noticed that browsing through the patch.
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> From: Igor Khavkine <i_khavki@alcor.concordia.ca>
> To: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
> Subject: Re: SSH patch finished & third shot at PAM
> [...]
> diff -ruN -x security Linux-PAM-0.72.orig/modules/pam_rhosts/pam_rhosts_auth.c Linux-PAM-0.72/modules/pam_rhosts/pam_rhosts_auth.c
> --- Linux-PAM-0.72.orig/modules/pam_rhosts/pam_rhosts_auth.c Sun Oct 29 14:31:51 2000
> +++ Linux-PAM-0.72/modules/pam_rhosts/pam_rhosts_auth.c Sun Oct 29 15:01:21 2000
> [...]
> @@ -593,6 +638,9 @@
>
> if (hostf != NULL)
> (void) fclose(hostf);
> +#ifdef MAXPATHLEN
> + free(pbuf);
> +#endif
>
> return answer;
> }
> [...]
> --
> Robbe
--
Stefanus Du Toit
sjdutoit at uwaterloo dot ca http://3.141593.org/
Please use GnuPG/PGP: http://3.141593.org/gpg/
! NOTE: New key as of 2000-10-31. DO NOT USE 0x302577A9 anymore !
Reply to: