Re: minimal Hurd system

To: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Cc: Glenn McGrath <bug1@optushome.com.au>, "debian-hurd@lists.debian.org" <debian-hurd@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: minimal Hurd system
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:32:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000919163207.A21259@priv3.onet.pl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000919170412.D275@ulysses.dhis.net>; from Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 05:04:12PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 39C6D3A9.3D796FB4@optushome.com.au> <[🔎] 20000919170412.D275@ulysses.dhis.net>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> ufs         # ufs, probably optional

Completely OT, but which filesystem is "better" for Hurd
(theoretically, not current implementation): ext2fs or ufs ?
What are architectural differences between them ?
Any URL ?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: minimal Hurd system
  - From: "Jim Franklin" <cykick2@home.com>

References:
- minimal Hurd system
  - From: Glenn McGrath <bug1@optushome.com.au>
- Re: minimal Hurd system
  - From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>

Prev by Date: Re: minimal Hurd system
Next by Date: Re: minimal Hurd system
Previous by thread: Re: minimal Hurd system
Next by thread: Re: minimal Hurd system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread