Re: Odd Guile compilation problems
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 04:52:09AM -0700, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
>
> Hmm, this is interesting. I see in another response to your message
> that it is a possible libtool issue. Could someone give me a
> suggestion as to how the rules file should handle this? is there some
> way I can force libtool to use a consistent versioning scheme?
As Mark said, he will fix this in libtool.
You are right, it is bad that our debian/rules files are very dependant on
the actual files produced by a package. This hits me everytime someone hard
codes i486-linux in the script for example.
The best we can do is to fix as many linuxisms as we can, and keep the files
generic. For example, use *.so.* to move the links and *.so to move the
library itself. This helps a bit.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
"The purpose of Free Software is Free Software.
The End and the Means are the same." -- Craig Sanders
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Reply to: