[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Qt 6 on X32 and HPPA ports: upstream requiring proof of usage

On 2/2/23 20:01, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:54:44 -03 Helge Deller escribió:
On 2/2/23 19:21, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:08:49 -03 Sam James escribió:

Pruning whatever code they do not test on the CI and does not has active
users, no matter how short/long it can be.

d2e4, someone suggested adding cross HPPA (and maybe others) to their
Docker setup. That could be a start.

I'm quite in contact with the CI staff. I sincerely don't think they will
want to add yet another CI image except they have a big client requiring
it :-/
I think this will only be debian, and gentoo - both distributions support
I'll bring it up next week, but I will not have high expectations on this.

Btw, I did noticed that the hppa build on debian failed, but was too busy
with other things to look into it. And, I was hoping someone would fix it
as it seemed trivial.
Beside the CI, we have two debian porterboxes for hppa, so testing is

Well, that's already a bad signal :-/ It means there are no real users for it
(yet?), else you would be seeing complaints :-(

why should one complain if the package is available although some of the builds fail?:
I'd like to get it to build always...
I mentioned the porterboxes to ease build-testing for debian developers.


Reply to: