Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns
* Florian Weimer:
>> * Concern for mips, mips64el, mipsel and ppc64el: no upstream support
>> in GCC
>> (Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch)
> I'm surprised to read this. ppc64el features prominently in the
> toolchain work I do (though I personally do not work on the GCC side).
The ppc64le situation has been clarified. It's now listed explicitly
as a primary architecture, as powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu:
This has always been the intent, but I can understand that
distributions view powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu and
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu quite very different things.