Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

To: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Cc: DSA <debian-admin@lists.debian.org>, Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>, debian-release <debian-release@lists.debian.org>, debian-ports@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
From: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 09:24:35 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] df0f823a6012d8589d83502f04747690@hub.kern.lc>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] b666e7e5-eaf9-a74b-10de-d18c8d0ee44f@thykier.net>
References: <[🔎] b666e7e5-eaf9-a74b-10de-d18c8d0ee44f@thykier.net>

On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote:

 * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el,
   s390x
   - *No* blockers at this time from RT, DSA nor security.
   - s390, ppc64el and all arm ports have DSA concerns.


What is the current DSA concern about s390x?

Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

References:
- [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

Prev by Date: Re: About structure sk_buff
Next by Date: Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Previous by thread: Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Next by thread: Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread