Re: Regressions when building glibc for HPPA.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno <email@example.com> wrote:
>> (1) tstdiomisc - Mark as expected fail until the compiler is fixed.
>> (2) tst-vfork1 - Kernel issue, mark this and tst-vfork2 as expected
>> fail until the kernel is fixed
>> (3) tststatic - Fixed by attached patch.
>> (4) tststatic2 - Likewise.
>> (5) tst-tls9-static - Likewise.
> I have already told you about that on IRC, but as other are following
> on the mailing lists, let's them know about the results.
> I confirm your patch fixes regressions (3), (4) and (5). I have applied
> it to the SVN. I have also marked regressions (1) and (2) as failing,
> with the corresponding bug report as a comment so that we can remove
> them when the problems are fixed.
I have also verified that it fixes (3), (4), and (5) on my test system.
> Thanks a lot for your help.
Thank you for applying the patches. I will work on getting them all
upstream so debian doesn't have to carry them.