Re: Architecture usertags
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:22:19AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the
> > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the
> > usertag (e.g., 'firstname.lastname@example.org' as user, and 'm68k' as
> > tag).
> Or email@example.com as user.
I did not think that would be a good idea, since the AFAIK the bts will
send out a mail to the mail address listed as user when a usertag is
set; it is okay if adding a 'powerpc' tag causes a mail to be sent to
the powerpc mailinglist; I do not think it is okay if that would cause a
mail to be sent to _all_ porter mailinglists.
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22