On Thursday 06 September 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 06 September 2007, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > > On 9/6/07, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote: > > > > Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the > > > > architecture of the kernel, and not the userspace architecture. > > > > This is not sufficient to configure runtime applications when > > > > multiple architectures are supported by one kernel. > > > > > > i'm not terribly familiar with the breadth of the parisc family, but > > > isnt 64bit only available with 2.0 ? so it'd be pretty clean on Linux > > > to say: hppa64-*-linux-* means 64bit userland, everything else is 32bit > > > > Seems you misunderstood jda's above comment. We do not have a 64bit > > userland on hppa. the 'hppa64' part of the target string represents > > the architecture of the /kernel/. 64bit kernels run a 32bit userland, > > hence hppa64-linux should be treated (so far) as hppa-linux. > > i didnt misunderstand anything > > i'm stating that an autotool based package should treat all hppa2.0 hosts > as 32bit userland which is exactly what gmp does not do which is to say i've sort of forked the thread as i'm not talking about the config.guess mis-guessing a 32bit userland under a 64bit kernel as hppa64 ... -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.