On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote: > With respect to hppa variants, this is a hopeless mess and I don't > believe this can be fixed. For example, libgmp treats hppa2.0w as > indicating a 64-bit runtime. I'm sure you have hit this. i think gmp is just plain broken in this respect > Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the > architecture of the kernel, and not the userspace architecture. > This is not sufficient to configure runtime applications when multiple > architectures are supported by one kernel. i'm not terribly familiar with the breadth of the parisc family, but isnt 64bit only available with 2.0 ? so it'd be pretty clean on Linux to say: hppa64-*-linux-* means 64bit userland, everything else is 32bit -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.