[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [parisc-linux] Glibc maintainers sought for m68k, hppa



[Cc:ing parisc-linux as interested people are there]

Hi!

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
In the upstream glibc repository, both M68K and HPPA ports have been
moved into the separate "ports" repository.  This means two things:

  - The core glibc maintainers will not update them when sweeping
    changes are made.  This was already the case; they're just making
    it clearer.

  - ACLs can be set up to allow a port maintainer to directly modify
    ports files.

I'm already covering two other ports, so I refuse to pick up two more
"orphans".  If you want continuing glibc support for these
architectures, I think we need to find developers interested in
maintaining them in the upstream trees.  I can point interested folks
at some of the recent changes which need to be synched to their ports,
but I'm not going to continue keeping a list much longer.

M68k in particular needs some loving.  New versions of glibc will not
build without TLS support; whether or not you go to full NPTL support
(which I highly recommend), you need to implement TLS.  It's not too
hard, really.  And it's long overdue.

Any takers?


For the HPPA port, guys from parisc-linux are doing very good job for both the kernel and the glibc. If I am right some of them (at least Carlos) have commit access to the CVS for HPPA.

Having write access to the Debian SVN, having an HPPA machine and reading debian-hppa, parisc-linux and libc-ports mailing-lists, I think I can work on merging the necessary patches to support HPPA in the Debian glibc.

Bye,
Aurelien

--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net



Reply to: