[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: build problems on sarti (was: Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails)

pe, 2006-01-06 kello 11:51 -0500, Kyle McMartin kirjoitti:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> > Anyhow, given how hppa is already among the architectures that did not
> > re-qualify for Etch, I propose that, from now on, hppa be ignored for
> > deciding whether a package is considered valid for going into Testing.
> Uhm. You're wrong?
> http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html

Ah. It seems I was.  My mistake.  Sorry!

> In any case, might as well ignore it. 

Well, this is the second time that installation of tetex fails on hppa.
According to the tetex maintainer, everything is kosher on his side, so
this brings the question why installation of tetex repeatedly fails and
only on hppa. Repeated occurrences of installation failure on a single
architecture is a highly suspicious matter. Granted, Planner is not an
essential package, but the situation is still bad omen.

Martin-Éric Racine

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digitaalisesti allekirjoitettu viestin osa

Reply to: