Re: Removing gcc-3.0 from unstable/testing
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:11:46PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> > Wasn't PALO (the bootloader) also build-dependant upon 3.0 at some point?
>
> Not really. It was a coincendence palo built with gcc 3.0 worked
> and palo built with later gcc didn't. The bug was in palo and I'm
> pretty sure paul fixed it in palo 1.5.
OK, good to know. Do I assume that there's nothing left that prevents 3.3 from
becoming the default compiler on hppa, then?
--
Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
Reply to: