Re: clisp build failure
On Friday 26 Mar 2004 18:02, you wrote:
> Isn't the definition of build-dep such that you shouldn't be able to
> build without one of the listed packages? What packages were different
> or missing?
libsigsegv-dev. clisp builds without it, but stack overflow detection is
disabled.
> *** - handle_fault error2 ! address = 0x4023fc60 not in
> [0x19bbc000,0x19be75f8) !
> SIGSEGV cannot be cured. Fault address = 0x4023fc60.
> make[1]: *** [interpreted.mem] Segmentation fault
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/carlos/src/clisp/clisp-2.33/debian/build'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
Hmm. I don't get this on paer. I have built a couple of packages on there by
hacking the control file and building libsigsegv by hand, but I would like to
be sure they can be reproducibly built.
Some slightly newer packages are isntalled on paer:
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii gcc 3.3.3-2 The GNU C compiler
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.7-5 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii debhelper 4.2.4 helper programs for debian/rules
ii gettext 0.14.1-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii bison 1.875a-1 A parser generator that is compatible with Y
ii libncurses5-de 5.4-2 Developer's libraries and docs for ncurses
ii groff 1.18.1-15 GNU troff text-formatting system
ii xlibs-dev 4.3.0-5 X Window System client library development f
ii libreadline4-d 4.3-10 GNU readline and history libraries, developm
The libsigsegv-dev I used was a newly built one from the libsigsegv 2.1
source. If you have the time I would be interested to see if you get the same
result with a fresh rebuild of the libsigsegv-dev package?
Perhaps the newer gcc may make some difference, but I would be surprised if it
did.
Reply to: