Re: Binutils on sarti ?
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:00:39AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > Looking at when the package was installed (in case it would have been
> > downgraded because of a new bug), I notice that the timestamp is quite
> > strange indeed:
> > dirson@sarti:~$ ls -l /var/lib/dpkg/info/binutils.list
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3981 May 15 2002 /var/lib/dpkg/info/binutils.list
> packages are built inside a chroot, so you are not looking in the right
> the buildd db shows the package as built successfully and uploaded..
Are you talking about binutils itself, or about the tulip and bigloo
packages ? The latter both show "undefined symbols" errors in the
latest build log, although they are tagged "maybe successful". I've
understood Lamont scheduled their rebuilt a couple of days ago, but
that did not occur yet, so I'm wondering whether all is going as
Especially, I'm waiting for those to build successfully to send a
patch upstream to tulip maintainer, because I had to patch for HPPA,
and bigloo upstream is waiting for feedback on HPPA (and a bugfix on
m68k) to finalize the current release.
Yann Dirson <firstname.lastname@example.org> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <email@example.com> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <firstname.lastname@example.org> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>