Re: g++ problem

[joel.soete@freebel.net]

Hey Richard,

Quoting Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>:

> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:57:49AM +0100, joel.soete@freebel.net wrote:
> > > > # update-alternatives --display c++
> > > > > No alternatives for c++
> 
> I get:
> 
> fatso:/build/menu/x/menu-2.1.5# update-alternatives --display c++
> c++ - status is auto.
>  link currently points to /usr/bin/g++
> /usr/bin/g++ - priority 20
>  slave c++.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/g++.1.gz
> Current `best' version is /usr/bin/g++.
> 

That is ok :<))

> 
> fatso:/build/menu/x/menu-2.1.5# ls -l /etc/alternatives/c++
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           12 Jul 15  1970
> /etc/alternatives/c++ -> /usr/bin/g++

That is not a link but a file (I certainly do have to do a link at one moment, a
hard not a soft?)

> 
> fatso:/build/menu/x/menu-2.1.5# ls -l /usr/bin/c++
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           21 Jul 15  1970 /usr/bin/c++ ->
> /etc/alternatives/c++
> 

That is Ok too.

So I check installed packages (mentionned below): also Ok.

So I remove the /usr/bin/c++ and launch update-alternatives --auto c++

Ok /usr/bin/c++ -> /etc/alternatives/c++

Also ./configure works fine now :<))) 

> 
> ./configure in the menu source tree runs ok for me.  This is a system
> installed from the 0.9.3 ISO, with gcc/g++ bits from unstable, to match
> the versions you have.
> 
> Can you compile simple test programs with g++ or c++ ?
> 
> Possibly relevant pkgs I have installed:
> 
> ii  g++            3.0.3-1        The GNU C++ compiler.
> ii  g++-3.0        3.0.3-0pre0112 The GNU C++ compiler.
> ii  gcc            3.0.3-1        The GNU C compiler.
> ii  gcc-3.0        3.0.3-0pre0112 The GNU C compiler.
> ii  gcc-3.0-base   3.0.3-0pre0112 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
> package).
> ii  libgcc1        3.0.3-0pre0112 GCC support library.
> 
> Richard
> 


Thanks a lot for help,
        Joel


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)