Re: Bug#901578: opa-basic-tools

To: debian-hpc <debian-hpc@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#901578: opa-basic-tools
From: Brian Smith <bsmith@systemfabricworks.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:22:41 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] CAC=5+HrOeM1b5=wFzSwjk2-q_GKNAXUSr2N=n8QqbTau72a67A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAC=5+Hp4oV8BUK0+yZ=_cmJkzxPpRqT8uTTAiAvoqEqaeLVQCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <152901651257.3770.8340217116831880928.reportbug@opa10.sfw.int> <CAC=5+Hqeub072ywe7uKvNfnhypFvU3GkA+5fvNuZZPs3xYYjEA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAC=5+Hp4oV8BUK0+yZ=_cmJkzxPpRqT8uTTAiAvoqEqaeLVQCw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi debian-hpc people,

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:18 PM Brian Smith <bsmith@systemfabricworks.com> wrote:
>
> > This is not the case with other Linux flavors, such as RHEL. Perhaps there is a
> > rules.d file that is missing?
>
> For clarification, this statement was made regarding the
> opa-basic-tools package delivered by Intel's IFS distribution for
> RHEL.
>
> RHEL's in-box opa-basic-tools exhibits the same behavior described by this bug.

Does anyone have thoughts on this bug? It blocks opa-ff from migrating
to testing.

-- 
Brian T. Smith
System Fabric Works
Senior Technical Staff
bsmith@systemfabricworks.com
GPG Key: 0xB3C2C7B73BA3CD7F

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#901578: opa-basic-tools
  - From: Brian Smith <bsmith@systemfabricworks.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#901578: opa-basic-tools
Next by Date: Processing of charliecloud_0.9.4-1_amd64.changes
Previous by thread: Bug#901578: opa-basic-tools
Next by thread: Processing of charliecloud_0.9.4-1_amd64.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread