Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-08-08 20:02:13) > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Robert Greener wrote: > > > Hi Jonas, > > > > On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 17:31 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-30 15:40:57) > >>> Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 15:20:34) > >>>> On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote: > >>>>>> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be > >>>>>> updated. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc > >>>>>> to its > >>>>>> latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> To make the task simpler, I intend to update the dependencies > >>>>>> so that > >>>>>> it can be bumped to 2.10.1, and then keep working up. > >>>> Jonas - Once haskell-commonmark-pandoc has been uploaded by Scott > >>>> & > >>>> gone through the NEW queue, you should have enough to upgrade > >>>> pandoc to > >>>> 2.10.1. Could you put this in experimental & I will update hakyll > >>>> and > >>>> patch patat & then everything can be moved to unstable. > >>> > >>> Yes, sounds like I have plenty to work with now. > >> > >> Pandoc 2.10 is now succesfully built in experimental. > > > > Excellent -- thanks! > > > >> Feel free to release dependency updates for that to unstable, then I > >> will release pandoc 2.10 to unstable as well. > >> > >> When haskell-commonmark-pandoc enters experimental I will look into > >> upgrading pandoc to 2.10.1. > >> > >> When haskell-pandoc-types is upgraded to 1.23 then I will look into > >> upgrading pandoc to 2.11 or newer... > > > > > > I'm away for the next few weeks. When I'm back I'll upgrade the few > > things that depend on pandoc and then it can all be moved. Hopefully, > > haskell-commonmark-pandoc will be in experimental by the time I'm back. > > You may want to follow the ITP bug (#1011459) so you get notified when > > it's in experimental. > > > >> Please note that if you choose to upgrade pandoc-types *before* > >> releasing current updates to unstable, then risk is higher that we > >> end > >> in a more complicated situation. Your choice. > > > > I'll leave it until its in unstable. > > FYI - I *think* when the current round of packages (hslua-module-path, > hslua-module-version, lpeg, pandoc-lua-marshal) clears NEW, it should be > possible to update pandoc in unstable. Exciting! Thanks for the heads up! I did notice the bug closures - I have a newer Pandoc release prepared and will try it out soon :-D - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature